Les Archives par catégorie
Technologie: Notre appréciation des nouveautés et découvertes technologiques.
dimanche, 2 mai 2004 • 10:17MarioSpina
J'attendais ce moment depuis quelques mois maintenant. Depuis la lecture d'un article sur Vonage.com dans un article du PC Magazine, j'avais hâte que Vonage offre son service téléphonique au Canada. Comme nous allons changer de résidence bientôt et que nous allons conserver notre lien internet haute vitesse, j'ai décidé de tenter l'expérience avec Vonage.ca et de ne pas faire transférer la ligne téléphonique standard. Il peut-être assez avantageux pour quelqu'un utilisant un lien internet autre vitesse de passé à ce genre de service téléphonique. Les prix sont très compétitifs (en fait, il n'y a aucun service téléphonique standard avec un prix aussi bas) et l'offre de Vonage contient des avantages marqués comparativement aux services téléphoniques standards comme pouvoir consulté ses messages en ligne, recevoir un avertissement par courriel lorsqu'un message apparaît sur la boîte vocale ou consulter la liste des appels fait et reçu.
L'installation est assez simple même si vous utilisez un routeur et que vous partagez votre lien internet entre plusieurs ordinateur. Vonage fourni un adapteur dans lequel vous allez brancher votre téléphone ou encore votre ligne téléphonique résidentielle (certaines précautions sont à prendre pour connecter le tout sur votre filage résidentiel). Si vous utilisez un routeur, l’adapteur peut-être branché avant (directement dans le modem de votre fournisseur internet) ou après celui-ci (directement dans le routeur). Vonage suggère fortement de connecter l’adapteur avant le routeur, mais si vous utilisez beaucoup les redirections de ports IP sur votre lien internet, je vous conseille de brancher l’adapteur directement dans le routeur puisque les options de redirection offerte par l’adapteur sont plutôt médiocre et mal implémantées. Si vous installez votre adapteur à même votre routeur, vous devrez ouvrir certains ports pour assurer la qualité de service nécessaire aux appels. Il se peut toutefois que ce ne soit pas suffisant, il faudra donc faire certain ajustement sur votre routeur pour assurer cette qualité de services. La combinaison d'un routeur tel que le WRT54G de Linksys et d'un micrologiciel (firmware) tel que celui offert par Sveasoft permet d'ajuster très précisément le routeur pour mieux supporter le VOIP.
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
lundi, 11 août 2003 • 22:23MarioSpina
Voici un bon article sur les filtres Bayesian contre le pourriel (spam). L'auteur fait une revue des différentes options pour une machine Linux. Plusieurs de ces solutions fonctionne aussi sur Windows (POPFile et SpamBayes par exemple).
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
mardi, 8 juillet 2003 • 11:16MarioSpina
Encore plus de détails sur les utilisation possible des Tags RFID. Cryptome a décidé de donner accès au mémos confidentiels qui sont passé entre les principaux intervenants.
Permalink Technologie
|
1 Commentaires
vendredi, 27 juin 2003 • 10:34MarioSpina
Plus de détail sur ces nouveaux codes barre radio. La banque centrale européenne prévoit même les utiliser dans leur papier monnaie pour les Euro. Une façon de suivre le passage de l'argent 'Cash'. Il sera de plus en plus difficile d'avoir des revenus cachés de l'impôt.
RFID Chips Are Here
RFID Chips Are Here
By Scott Granneman
Posted: 27/06/2003 at 13:17 GMT
Bar codes are something most of us never think about. We go to the grocery store to buy dog food, the checkout person runs our selection over the scanner, there's an audible beep or boop, and then we're told how much money we owe. Bar codes in that sense are an invisible technology that we see all the time, but without thinking about what's in front of our eyes.
Bar codes have been with us so long, and they're so ubiquitous, that its hard to remember that they're a relatively new technology that took a while to catch on. The patent for bar codes was issued in 1952. It took twenty years before a standard for bar codes was approved, but they still didn't catch on. Ten years later, only 15,000 suppliers were using bar codes. That changed in 1984. By 1987 - only three years later! - 75,000 suppliers were using bar codes. That's one heck of a growth curve.
So what changed in 1984? Who, or what, caused the change?
Wal-Mart.
When Wal-Mart talks, suppliers listen. So when Wal-Mart said that it wanted to use bar codes as a better way to manage inventory, bar codes became de rigeur. If you didn't use bar codes, you lost Wal-Mart's business. That's a death knell for most of their suppliers.
The same thing is happening today. I'm here to tell you that the bar code's days are numbered. There's a new technology in town, one that at first blush might seem insignificant to security professionals, but it's a technology that is going to be a big part of our future. And how do I know this? Pin it on Wal-Mart again; they're the big push behind this new technology.
So what is it? RFID tags.
RFID 101
Invented in 1969 and patented in 1973, but only now becoming commercially and technologically viable, RFID tags are essentially microchips, the tinier the better. Some are only 1/3 of a millimeter across. These chips act as transponders (transmitters/responders), always listening for a radio signal sent by transceivers, or RFID readers. When a transponder receives a certain radio query, it responds by transmitting its unique ID code, perhaps a 128-bit number, back to the transceiver. Most RFID tags don't have batteries (How could they? They're 1/3 of a millimeter!). Instead, they are powered by the radio signal that wakes them up and requests an answer.
Most of these "broadcasts" are designed to be read between a few inches and several feet away, depending on the size of the antenna and the power driving the RFID tags (some are in fact powered by batteries, but due to the increased size and cost, they are not as common as the passive, non-battery-powered models). However, it is possible to increase that distance if you build a more sensitive RFID receiver.
RFID chips cost up to 50 cents, but prices are dropping. Once they get to 5 cents each, it will be cost-efficient to put RFID tags in almost anything that costs more than a dollar.
Who's using RFID?
RFID is already in use all around us. Ever chipped your pet dog or cat with an ID tag? Or used an EZPass through a toll booth? Or paid for gas using ExxonMobils' SpeedPass? Then you've used RFID.
Some uses, especially those related to security, seem like a great idea. For instance, Delta is testing RFID on some flights, tagging 40,000 customer bags in order to reduce baggage loss and make it easier to route bags if customers change their flight plans.
Three seaport operators - who account for 70% of the world's port operations - agreed to deploy RFID tags to track the 17,000 containers that arrive each day at US ports. Currently, less than 2% are inspected. RFID tags will be used to track the containers and the employees handling them.
The United States Department of Defense is moving into RFID in order to trace military supply shipments. During the first Gulf War, the DOD made mistakes in its supply allocation. To streamline operations, the U.S. military has placed RFID tags on 270,000 cargo containers and tracks those shipments throughout 40 countries.
On a smaller level, but one that will instantly resonate with security pros, Star City Casino in Sydney, Australia placed RFID tags in 80,000 employee uniforms in order to put a stop to theft. The same idea would work well in corporate PCs, networking equipment, and handhelds.
In all of these cases, RFID use seems reasonable. It is non-intrusive, and it seems to balance security and privacy. Other uses for RFID, however, may be troublesome.
Visa is combining smart cards and RFID chips so people can conduct transactions without having to use cash or coins. These smart cards can also be incorporated into cell phones and other devices. Thus, you could pay for parking, buy a newspaper, or grab a soda from a vending machine without opening your wallet. This is wonderfully convenient, but the specter of targeted personal ads popping up as I walk through the mall, a la Minority Report, does not thrill me.
Michelin, which manufactures 800,000 tires a day, is going to insert RFID tags into its tires. The tag will store a unique number for each tire, a number that will be associated with the car's VIN (Vehicle Identification Number). Good for Michelin, and car manufacturers, and fighting crime. Potentially bad for you. Who will assure your privacy? Do you really want your car's tires broadcasting your every move?
The European Central Bank may embed RFID chips in the euro note. Ostensibly to combat counterfeiters and money-launderers, it would also enable banks to count large amounts of cash in seconds. Unfortunately, such a move would also makes it possible for governments to track the passage of cash from individual to individual. Cash is the last truly anonymous way to buy and sell. With RFID tags, that anonymity would be gone. In addition, banks would not be the only ones who could in an instant divine how much cash you were carrying; criminals can also obtain power transceivers.
Several major manufacturers and retailers expect RFID tags to aid in managing the supply chain, from manufacturing to shipping to stocking store shelves, including Gillette (which purchased 500 million RFID tags for its razors), Home Depot, The Gap, Proctor & Gamble, Prada, Target, Tesco (a United Kingdom chain), and Wal-Mart. Especially Wal-Mart.
The retail giant, the largest employer in America, is working with Gillette to create "smart shelves" that can alert managers and stockboys to replenish the supply of razors. More significantly, Wal-Mart intends for its top 100 suppliers to fully support RFID for inventory tracking by 2005. Wal-Mart would love to be able to point an RFID reader at any of the 1 billion sealed boxes of widgets it receives every year and instantly know exactly how many widgets it has. No unpacking, no unnecessary handling, no barcode scanners required.
RFID Issues
Right now, you can buy a hammer, a pair of jeans, or a razor blade with anonymity. With RFID tags, that may be a thing of the past. Some manufacturers are planning to tag just the packaging, but others will also tag their products. There is no law requiring a label indicating that an RFID chip is in a product. Once you buy your RFID-tagged jeans at The Gap with RFID-tagged money, walk out of the store wearing RFID-tagged shoes, and get into your car with its RFID-tagged tires, you could be tracked anywhere you travel. Bar codes are usually scanned at the store, but not after purchase. But RFID transponders are, in many cases, forever part of the product, and designed to respond when they receive a signal. Imagine everything you own is "numbered, identified, catalogued, and tracked." Anonymity and privacy? Gone in a hailstorm of invisible communication, betrayed by your very property.
But let's not stop there. Others are talking about placing RFID tags into all sensitive or important documents: "it will be practical to put them not only in paper money, but in drivers' licenses, passports, stock certificates, manuscripts, university diplomas, medical degrees and licenses, birth certificates, and any other sort of document you can think of where authenticity is paramount." In other words, those documents you're required to have, that you can't live without, will be forever tagged.
Consider the human body as well. Applied Digital Solutions has designed an RFID tag - called the VeriChip - for people. Only 11 mm long, it is designed to go under the skin, where it can be read from four feet away. They sell it as a great way to keep track of children, Alzheimer's patients in danger of wandering, and anyone else with a medical disability, but it gives me the creeps. The possibilities are scary. In May, delegates to the Chinese Communist Party Congress were required to wear an RFID-equipped badge at all times so their movements could be tracked and recorded. Is there any doubt that, in a few years, those badges will be replaced by VeriChip-like devices?
Surveillance is getting easier, cheaper, smaller, and ubiquitous. Sure, it's possible to destroy an RFID tag. You can crush it, puncture it, or microwave it (but be careful of fires!). You can't drown it, however, and you can't demagnetize it. And washing RFID-tagged clothes won't remove the chips, since they're specifically designed to withstand years of wearing, washing, and drying. You could remove the chip from your jeans, but you'd have to find it first.
That's why Congress should require that consumers be notified about products with embedded RFID tags. We should know when we're being tagged. We should also be able to disable the chips in our own property. If it's the property of the company we work for, that's a different matter. But if it's ours, we should be able to control whether tracking is enabled.
Security professionals need to realize that RFID tags are dumb devices. They listen, and they respond. Currently, they don't care who sends the signal. Anything your companies' transceiver can detect, the bad guy's transceiver can detect. So don't be lulled into a false sense of security.
With RFID about to arrive in full force, don't be lulled at all. Major changes are coming, and not all of them will be positive. The law of unintended consequences is about to encounter surveillance devices smaller than the period at the end of this sentence.
© SecurityFocus.com
Scott Granneman is a senior consultant for Bryan Consulting Inc. in St. Louis. He specializes in Internet Services and developing Web applications for corporate, educational, and institutional clients.
Permalink Technologie
|
4 Commentaires
jeudi, 26 juin 2003 • 15:08MarioSpina
Voici un excellent article expliquant de façon claire ce que sont les filtres de pourriels utilisant la methode Bayesian. Un Must si vous êtes totalement écoeuré de recevoir des courriels douteux.
Sorting the ham from the spam
By David Walker
June 24 2003
Would you use the phone if you had to listen to a 10-second brothel advertisement every time you made a call? That is the size of the challenge that confronts email: beat spam, or the medium will forever fall short of its potential.
You can block out 50 per cent or 75 per cent of spam quite easily. But as spam volumes rise, even a 90 per cent blocking rate can leave you glimpsing a daily dozen spiels for generic Viagra and "barnyard fun''. Yes, you can hit the "delete" key but this last 10 per cent wears you down. Anti-spam initiatives from AOL, Microsoft, Yahoo and the US Government seem likely to whittle the 10 per cent down only a little.
Can we block the last 10 per cent? Maybe. A technique called Bayesian filtering is capable of blocking more than 99 per cent of spam.
Bayesian filtering owes its rise largely to Paul Graham, a polymathic Harvard computer science PhD. Late last year he wrote "A Plan For Spam" (www.paulgraham.com/spam.html), setting out with extraordinary clarity why well-implemented Bayesian filtering should work better than other methods. After Graham pointed the way, new Bayesian filtering implementations appeared within a few weeks and dozens are now available.
Bayesian filtering uses the work of the 18th century English philosopher Thomas Bayes to suggest how likely something is to be true. A Bayesian analysis of my latest email message compares its word content to that of my spam and my good email ("ham") and calculates which it more resembles. For instance, the word "calculated" appears 30 times in my ham but only twice in my spam. The word "apologize" appears five times in my ham but 256 times in my spam.
Such a system works best when it is "trained" - given a pile of spam emails and a pile of non-spam, such as the content of your inbox or mail archives. Once trained, it:
- takes into account words that spammers rarely use (for instance, "calculated")
- takes into account words that spammers use surprisingly often (such as "apologize" and "all", in my case)
- takes into account words that you use frequently ( in my case, "drives" and "science"
- takes into account words others might use but you do not (my genuine correspondents and I "apologise" more often than we "apologize")
- builds a score, rather than ruling messages out (occasionally I want to read a message with "apologize" in it).
Given the simplicity of Bayesian filtering, it is astonishing that it took so long to be applied successfully. Microsoft has people working on Bayesian filtering and has had for years.
Graham suggests earlier researchers made some simple mistakes. But it still took him a long time to turn to a Bayesian approach. "I don't know why I avoided trying the statistical approach for so long," wrote Graham in "A Plan for Spam".
"I think it was because I got addicted to trying to identify spam features myself, as if I were playing some kind of competitive game with the spammers . . . When I did try statistical analysis, I found immediately that it was much cleverer than I had been."
Because they score and take into account the good as well as the bad, Bayesian filters produce few false positives - emails that your system wrongly calls "spam". And, because it works on your personal preferences, it is hard for spammers to fool.
After all, if they start sending messages containing "drives" and "science" they might fool my Bayesian filter but will have no influence on anyone else's.
So far spam evolution has outraced every new filter. The most exciting possibility of Bayesian filtering is a set of filters the spammers can't beat.
Bayesian filtering
The whole point of Bayesian filtering is that it analyses your email, not everyone's. So while you can implement it at the server level, a client-side Bayesian filter makes sense. Enter Melbourne-based Mark Hammond, one of the world's leading Python programming experts, with a Bayesian filter that installs right into your copy of Outlook 2000 or Outlook XP. You can download it from starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/spambayes/ and start training it to recognise your spam and ham straight away.
This story was found at: Sorting the ham from the spam - smh.com.au
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
vendredi, 23 mai 2003 • 22:01MarioSpina
Une approche intéressante des problèmes pouvant être causés par la Souris. Reste à voir si la solution est vraiment viable.
Wired News: Gesture Your Mouse Goodbye
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
dimanche, 27 avril 2003 • 19:33MarioSpina
Un accessoire pas mal intéressant pour le Ipod... ayant mon Ipod depuis maintenant plusieurs mois, je ne peux vous dire combien cet article aurait été utile. À maintes reprises j'ai eu le regret de ne pouvoir écouter ma musique ailleurs (chez des amis ou des parents) puisque j'avais oublier d'apporter un fil 1/8 Stereo - RCA... FINI maintenant
Je trippe !
Griffin Technology
You are looking at the coolest iPod accessory in the world. The iTrip FM transmitter for the iPod can play your music through any FM radio in your car, at a party, wherever the mood strikes you - and you have a radio.
It's clear that the iTrip is made specifically for the iPod. This gives iTrip advantages over similar devices. For example, with the iTrip, you can have the cleanest possible signal - because you can choose any radio station on the dial to tune for the best performance possible. You do this by 'playing' special station codes directly from the iPod itself. Simple.
Another advantage of the iTrip is that it needs no batteries, it receives its tiny amount of power from the iPod, and it can rotate out of the way to charge the iPod while still in use. No more batteries ever again.
There’s not even a power switch – just plug it in and go. It shuts off if automatically after 30 seconds of silence - just like the iPod. The iTrip is the ultimate accessory for the iPod because it allows you to share the music and share the fun beyond your headphones. Don't leave home without it.
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
mercredi, 12 février 2003 • 19:01MarioSpina
Wow!
Si vous avez un grand besoin d'espace disque, voici ce qu'il vous faut:
Avec 500 Gb, je pense que c'est amplement suffisant.
LaCie - The Big Disk.
Permalink Technologie
|
1 Commentaires
mercredi, 22 janvier 2003 • 07:56MarioSpina
Bon pour ceux qui veulent savoir, voici une partie de ma liste d'abonnements RSS que je consulte avec Syndirella:
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
lundi, 20 janvier 2003 • 23:26MarioSpina

Dans la même ligne que les écrans flexibles et pliables, voici une technologie qui promet de révolutionner la taille de nos portable sous peu. Le clavier est projeté sur une surface plane et un senseur laser ou une mini caméra suit le mouvement des doigts sur le clavier pour les traduire et les transmettre à l'ordinateur. Voici un lien sur un article offrant un apperçu des principaux joueurs dans ce domaine.
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
dimanche, 19 janvier 2003 • 22:29MarioSpina
Le développement des nano-technologies promet une révolution technologique importante d'ici quelques dizaines d'années. Les applications possibles de ces technologies sont multiples et elle commencent déjà à être disponible sur le marché. Plusieurs compagnies ont déjà des prototypes de produits commercialement viables qui peuvent révolutionner le marché. Voici un texte donnant quelques exemples:
Imagine never having to polish your shoes again, having glistening white teeth without visiting a dentist, or owning a mobile phone powered by a miniature battery. These are not just idle fantasies, but a reality where small things could make your wildest dreams come true.
A band of scientists believe they can push the boundaries of chemistry and physics to create a host of tiny particles that could revolutionise products we use every day. Welcome to the wonderful world of nanotechnology.
You may already be digesting and using nanoproducts without knowing it. Fizzy drinks and fruit juices get their rainbow of colours from tiny particles that dissolve in liquid and disappear without a trace.
Many vitamins are insoluble in water but can be added to food by making them into particles smaller than the eye can see. Cosmetics such as sunscreen are made of mini-particles that act as miniature solar soldiers, absorbing harmful ultra-violet light to protect your skin from the sun.
At a recent conference in Mannheim, Germany, scientists working at the chemical company BASF presented a huge range of products that could soon be out on supermarket shelves.
Nanotechnology has been heralded as one of the key technologies of the 21st century. By manipulating particles 50,000 times smaller than a human hair, materials can be merged into products or can create new properties.
Manufactured products are made from atoms. Their properties depend on how the atoms are arranged. What nanotechnology does is build things one atom at a time to create myriad novel molecular goods possessing amazing properties.
The magical trick is to manipulate the molecules and place them where they are needed to make the right structure. Nature has played an inspirational role in pushing this mini-world forward.
The leaf of an exotic flower inspired the creation of a spray that refuses to let dirt stick to shoes. The lotus flower from Asia has leaves with a strange arrangement of wax crystals on its surface that repel water. As this liquid rolls over leather, it takes any dust or dirt along for the ride, leaving your shoes spotless.
Harald Keller, a polymer scientist at BASF, has trapped this lotus effect in a can. Once you apply the spray, it dries into the leather and takes on an arrangement similar to the leaves.
"I believe that, with improvements, this spray should conceivably last a few years before having to be reapplied," says Keller. It could also be used on building materials, paper and textiles.
It is not only footwear that benefits from the wonders of the nanoworld. The effect that film stars get from teeth bleaching to blind us on-screen could soon be available in a humble tube of toothpaste.
"At the moment, every time you brush your teeth you damage the enamel. This latest idea is to rebuild the attacked enamel using nanoparticles incorporated in toothpaste that seals pores and restores the natural whiteness of the teeth," says Ralf Norenberg, from the performance chemical division at BASF.
Norenberg made tiny particles of hydroxyapatite, which has the same chemical structure as tooth enamel. He found that, when applied to teeth, it created a protective coating that did not allow dirt to invade. The key lies in the unique shape of the apatite particles.
This material forms a suspension of rod-shaped crystallites that ensures the teeth get all-over smooth cover and demonstrates flawless organisation, claims Norenberg. Other products already on the market are not as effective and use optical brightness, which "paints" your pearly whites, causing pimples to form that allow bacteria to settle and breed on the surface.
The miniature wonder-workers do not stop there. In a world driven by technology there is always a need to create and store information more efficiently. As mobiles and laptops get smaller, their source of power needs to do the same.
A revolutionary nanocube that can store hydrogen may solve this problem. These cubes, combining the features of plastic drink bottles and sun cream - terephthalic acid and zinc oxide - have a huge range of applications. Their high surface area and porous nature allows them to adsorb hydrogen and release the gas as energy when a rapid drop in pressure occurs.
As they are rechargeable, they could replace conventional batteries. Storing the gas in a container the size of a cigarette lighter would mean they could power small portable appliances for up to 10 hours."
via: Tiny technology, big ideas @ theage.com.au
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
mercredi, 8 janvier 2003 • 21:00MarioSpina
Dans la ligne de la photographie digitale, j'ai fait une découverte intéressante cette semaine. Une nouvelle technologie développée par Carver Mead. Pour ceux qui ne connaissent pas M. Mead, disons seulement qu'il est une vraie mine d'idées pratiques en électronique. Professeur à Caltech, les créations de Mead ont initié le lancement d'au moins 20 entreprises dont Intel. A lui seul, il a au moins 50 brevets pour ses inventions. Sa toute dernière découverte promet de révolutionner le monde de la photographie digitale. En voulant mieux comprendre le fonctionnement de l'Å“il humain, Mead a réussi à simplifier le fonctionnement des senseurs utilisés dans les caméras numériques. Sa technologie permet une définition de l'image et précision des couleurs encore inégalées dans le monde de l'image digitale. Je ne sais pas pour vous, mais ayant constaté les résultats sur leur site, j'ai très hâte que les manufacturiers de caméras implémentent ce type de senseur. Voici un article à ce sujet et le lien sur le site de X3 de Foveon:
The Next Photography Revolution
Foveon - X3 Technology
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
mardi, 12 novembre 2002 • 07:02MarioSpina
Damned !
Ma Geforce 2 (Asus) vient de me lâcher. Il semble que le ventilateur du GPU ne fonctionnait plus depuis un certain temps. Ce qui a fait chauffer la carte. Maintenant la carte affiche avec presque plus de brightness et on voit apparaître des lignes et du ghosting à profusion. Je dois donc me trouver une nouvelle carte vidéo. Par contre comme mais besoin en gaming on beaucoup diminuer, je cherche quelque chose de beau, bon et pas trop cher. Je n'ai pas besoin d'une carte "Top of the line". Des suggestions ?
Permalink Technologie
|
1 Commentaires
samedi, 7 septembre 2002 • 14:00MarioSpina
Le Ipod est enfin arrivé après 5 semaines de longue attente. J'ai été très surpris en ouvrant la boîte de voir la taille de ce lecteur de MP3. Je n'avais pas eu la chance dans tenir un dans ma main avant, j'ai été très agréablement surpris par la petite taille de ce bijou. La qualité sonore est excellent, l'autonomie aussi (près de 10hrs sans arrêt). La télécommande fourni par Apple fonctionne très bien et elle est bien utile lorsque le Ipod est dans votre poche ou a votre taille. Le seul point passable est l'obligation d'utiliser MusicMatch pour la synchronisation avec le Ipod, j'aurais aimé avoir plus de flexibilité, j'espère que des développeurs vont nous concocter quelque chose. De plus, le Ipod version Windows ne supporte pas les documents Audible (contrairement au Ipod version Apple).
Je l'utilise depuis bientôt une semaine et il me semble que le Ipod est un puit sans fond pour contenir ma musique (c'est vrai que j'ai la version 20 Gb). Le transfer de fichier est très rapide par le port Firewire, le seul inconvénient c'est que le port Firewire n'est pas présent sur tout les PC. La grande capacité de mon Ipod me permet d'apporter avec moi mon entière collection de CD (ou presque). Depuis une semaine, je redécouvre ma collection. C'est fantastique.
Permalink Technologie
|
Commentez ici
mercredi, 31 juillet 2002 • 20:27MarioSpina
Je commence a considéré sérieusement l'aquisition d'un de ces petits bijoux. Surtout que Apple vient de se décider a produire des unités complètement compatibles PC. Avec une possibilité de 20 Gb, je pense que çà serait suffisant pour toute ma collection.
Pour ceux que ca intéresse, allez voir ce video et cette animation Quicktime VR,vous en resterez bouche bée. Pour le Geek en vous, il y a aussi Ipoding et iPodHacks.
Permalink Technologie
|
2 Commentaires